“Perogative” Revisited
April 15th, 2009, by Kirk MahoneyI got an interesting email message last Sunday from one of your fellow readers of this blog.
I will refer to him simply as “Ian” because I don’t have permission to use his surname.
Ian had read “Perogative” and wanted to share his own perspective from the United Kingdom.
When I searched Google for each of the following (with the quotation marks, to avoid variations) for my original blog post, I got about the indicated numbers of matches:
- “perogative” — spelled P-E-R-O-G-A-T-I-V-E — 5,750,000 matches
- “prerogative” — spelled P-R-E-R-O-G-A-T-I-V-E — 5,610,000 matches
This told me that Web authors had favored the incorrect word over the correct word by a ratio of 1.02-to-1, which is horrible!
When Ian tries to access Google.com in the UK, Google auto-redirects him to Google.co.uk, where he got these statistics:
- “perogative” — spelled P-E-R-O-G-A-T-I-V-E — 244,000 matches
- “prerogative” — spelled P-R-E-R-O-G-A-T-I-V-E — 4,000,000 matches
I could not exactly reproduce Ian’s results, but I searched at Google.co.uk and got nearly the same ratio that he did.
The 16.4-to-1 dominance of the correct spelling at Google.co.uk puzzles Ian and his fiancée, given that they agree that the incorrect pronunciation and spelling of “prerogative” is very common in the UK.
Copyright © 2009 Kirk Mahoney, Ph.D.
Related Posts

